Well, that just leaves the problem of two thirds of the article being devoted to legal threats rather than knowledgable text. I'm glad to see a new image that actually fits the task requirements has finally been posted. It's been a while, but I decided to check up on a few of my older editting haunts. While a more explicit image would not have been preferable, being more or less "revealing" or "implying" was not the deciding factor. It may also be more representative in style of this article's subject. Image:Lolicon Sample.png is GFDL-licensed and therefore more compatible with Wikipedia's image use policy. contribs) 31 December 2007 See #New image below.implying but more revealing image? -Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.219.74 ( talk It's about time this article got a decent image. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC) It doesn't have to be sexual (or even suggestive) to be lolicon though.- SeizureDog 23:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC) I think that image looks fine. (I will also say now that I also refuse to draw an image). He stated on his talk page before that he does not wish to draw sexual graphics for the site. For those wishing to ask Kasuga for a drawing, he won't do it. edg ☺ ★ 06:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Couldn't we just have a photo of a little girl? - SeizureDog 07:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC) No, since that will open a whole new can of worms (privacy, bluring and God-knows what else). Further complaints about the existing picture won't really address the problem. A better image that conforms to GFDL would be quite welcome. This has been discussed a million billion times.
Farix ( Talk) 15:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC) If you want a better picture, contact a Japanese artist and tell them Wikipedia's constraints and the GFDL requirement. Why do you think they decided on something that's not at all representative of the subject otherwise? - lucid 14:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC) It's not a matter if a lolicon will find the image attractive, but whether the image fairly represents the subject of the article.
No lolicon would find that thing attractive. As one who thinks plenty of inappropriate thoughts while reading loli manga, I can tell you that that thing is hideous and must go.
The current image ( Image:Lolicon example.jpg) is a terrible example.
0 kommentar(er)
